![]() But today’s chips are pursuing record-breaking performance numbers with less regard to energy use. Just a couple of years ago, power consumption was not a hot topic when evaluating processors. It’s indeed the world’s fastest gaming chip. However, the Core i9-13900K has more right to strut about the barnyard. But regardless of what reviews you read and what data you see, the main point here is that you’re not getting a major boost gen-over-gen, and both the 13900K and 7950X rock. Our gaming benchmarks reflect the latter approach, which is why the performance difference appears relatively small. In many gaming PCs, the graphics card is the constraining factor, not the CPU. So instead, you can test at a more standard resolution (1080p is currently the most popular) and push up the graphics settings to levels that more people chase. However, such test conditions sometimes are fairly disconnected from real-world scenarios. This approach helps identify who has the higher performing architecture. Such settings put less stress on the graphics card, so the burden of work goes back to the CPU. Reviewers can choose to isolate CPU performance when benchmarking by dropping to a lower resolution or lower graphics settings. Why the discrepancy? Very likely, differences in testing criteria. Superior gaming performance is more of a bragging right than a primary concern for chips like the 13900K-but with pre-launch whispers on the internet about Intel claiming up to 11 percent higher performance in games, it bears a look. These two chips keep each other on their toes, with the performance deltas often in the range of single-digit percentages. If you’ve gone all in on Davinci Resolve or instead have a workload that involves huge sets of numbers in Excel, you may not really see as much of a difference between Intel and AMD. ![]() The 7950X isn’t entirely out in the cold-using Premiere again as example, the gap in performance is barely 2 percent when only raw performance is examined. Not everyone uses the same applications, of course. Until AMD can get similar support for Ryzen 7000’s integrated graphics, the real-world advantage goes to Intel. The 13900K offers as much as 25 percent higher performance in Adobe Premiere, as Premiere can lean on the chip’s integrated graphics to speed up tasks like editing. Pragmatically speaking, if you’re a content creator looking solely at numbers and not thinking about outside factors, Intel’s scores average out to form a more appealing picture. We’ll start with the main reason to buy a Core i9-13900K-multithreaded tasks that put every bit of the processor to work.īut Intel is more of the winner overall in this dustup, thanks to better integration with popular software like Adobe Creative Suite and its lead in single- and lightly threaded performance. For full test bench details, jump to the end of this article. Software was run in Windows 11 Home (22H1). Note: Our benchmarks were performed by pairing each of the four chips mentioned above (13900K, 12900K, 7950X, 5950X) with an RTX 3090 Founders Edition graphics card, AIO CPU cooler, PCIe 4.0 SSD, and 32GB RAM (DDR5-6000 MT/s for the Intel CPUs and 7950X, DDR4-3600 MT/s for the 5950X). Our YouTube review (embedded above) dives deep into the details, but for the main takeaways, read on. But each holds a lead in different areas, and if you’re a person eyeing this chip for heavy workloads, Ryzen 7000 could still be the better choice. ![]() In general, both the Core i9-13900K and 7950X post incredibly fast scores and easily tear past their predecessors. ![]() You have to examine the numbers to get a bead on performance differences, especially in the apps you’ll use most. These benchmark results are particularly important when comparing Intel and AMD’s offerings-because of Intel’s hybrid architecture that combines lower-power efficiency cores and higher-octane performance cores, you can’t compare its core counts directly against AMD’s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |